Thank you and welcome in
Don’t worry about these two, they are still sulking because I put them right on the other thread
Including the origin and the plain lies which were incorporated in that 97% figure, if I remember correctly, the REAL % was way less than 50 and pretty much ALL of those were having papers or books published as to the disasters it would create ie Every one of them (The sample was very small had a vested financial interest in the “Truth” of it- I also addressed the infamous "Hockey stick " graph so beloved of Al Gore’s film whaich has been proven to have been faked - in line with some of the e-mails from the “Climategate scandal” where it was shown that those "Peer reviewers were saying that it would be convenient if the Medieval warm period and the Little ice age had not existed - and Voila they did not when the IPCC Published it !
THe reality is much as you say
The “science” has got so interwined with Politics that it is frankly impossible to untangle ! and impossible to assess whether there is ANY actual merit in the case at all !
My links above were in similar vain, but when your "Audience " freely admits they did not even bother to follow your links, perhaps they can be said to be “Biased” - Not really much conversation to be had when one of the parties is dancing a jig, with his fingers firmly syuck in both ears and chanting "Nah, Nahna Nah NAAH ! "
However when the exhorbitant fuel costs are directly causing the deaths of 2700 of my countrymen every year - IT IS Time to declare an objection to this PC Rubbish !
WHEN i started this thread I was comparing the huge main stream reporting a few “Global Warmists” were getting as opposed to the rising from nowhere of the New Leading score party in the Brexit stakes ! - so studiously IGNORED by the main stream media
Much really as a comment on media bias.