The "Holy Grail"?

Hi all,

After approx 16 months of strife and enormous expense, i have now become profitable JUST but JUST, is a HUGE step forward.

I’m currently testing something that i’ve basically stumbled across and it looks MASSIVELY encouraging. I’m using TWO on chart indicators and a DOUBLE MACD on the DAILY chart. Initial testing is providing a strike rate of over 70% and the other 30% are small losses/break evens.

Early days i know but if this strategy is confirmed, and i can nail down stops & targets, i WILL happily share it with fellow “PIPSTERS”

ONWARDS & UPWARDS :- )

1 Like

Congratulations. Key now is to not let that go to your head and just focus on doing more of what is working and improving the size of your dataset.

Totally agree. I’ve come across many ideas that look great at face value but this is by far, the best I’ve seen. Testing 8 pairs since 2019 on daily chart now and it’s confirming what I thought but now the hard bit! Targets and stops :thinking:

Hi, fascinating post. Quite how you have found a strategy without deciding your risk per trade (your stops) and your target reward per trade (your targets) is an anathema to me (the system not you :slightly_smiling_face:)

In all my backtesting of systems, strategies, plans, I have not yet found a way to come up with meaningful results unless I had to set risk (stop loss) as a percentage of bank, and set reward (price to exit) as a criterion to determine profit / loss per trade.

Please advise test plan that resulted in positive edge without definition of funds at risk and reward targets.

How true. I am trading price structures again like I did 30 years ago (quite profitably) but have tried many other things off and on. Managing the risk is what has allowed me to keep on keeping on.

I absolutely GET your points and much has yet to be determined. I’m always the realist even when I MAY have discovered something? I’ve been here before so enthusiasm is always reigned in. I will gladly elaborate on my findings in due course :+1:

1 Like