Alas, no - this doesn’t follow at all! :58:
Being “represented on BabyPips” [U]can[/U] in some cases be an indication that a brokerage is specifically trying to attract inexperienced, newbie, gullible traders, and that [U]can[/U] in some cases be a very bad sign.
You need to start by deciding whether you want a genuine broker (who acts on your behalf in the interbank market, to which you don’t have access yourself, without themselves being involved in the outcome of your trades, and prefers you to win), or a counterparty market-maker (who trades against you, holding the other side of your positions, as well as your deposited funds, while having a potential incentive for you to lose).
The catch is that you need a significant deposit, to use a genuine broker.
If you can afford a real one, Interactive Brokers is excellent but perhaps not for the totally inexperienced - their customer service doesn’t do a lot of hand-holding. AMP is also good.
If you need a counterparty one (smaller deposits), in my opinion it’s hard to do much better than Oanda (I traded there for a long time with no problems, and I did a [U]lot[/U] of research first. They’re honest.)
Depending on where you live, go for one that’s well-regulated (FCA-regulated is good. Cyprus is bad, [I]very[/I] bad - “offshore” is generally bad: it means they wanted minimal regulation and that’s a really bad sign), and one that has enforced segregation of customer deposits and their own management/operational funds.
Check their [I][U]regulatory record[/U][/I]: that’s [U]objective and factual and typically involves issues arising over multiple complaints from customers[/U].
It’s not an easy business at all, choosing a broker. But it’s quite important.
[B][U]Avoid[/U][/B] brokers with gimmicks like “no-deposit bonuses”: that’s a [B][U]big[/U][/B] red flag. Customers are paying for those, indirectly.
If you’re in the UK or Ireland, think seriously about whether a spread-betting broker might actually be better … and don’t listen to the people who will tell you that their spreads are wide, that they’re badly regulated or that they all “trade against you”: all this information is horribly out of date and inaccurate, but unfortunately it’s still rather widely believed in trading forums. Spread-betting has a lot of advantages (especially the fact that all profits are usually tax-free), if it’s available to you.
But if not, and if you’re talking about a smallish deposit, I would just try Oanda, myself. Their spreads are no worse than anyone else’s, and they suited me, when I was starting out.