Hey there,
I remember those times in the room…when others and me were asking questions and many times weren’t getting proper answers.
Back then I thought it is just the way he is and his calls were good in that time and resulted in good trades (for the room)… he said short at x… and a small bit later or so he and people in the room were joining. Sadly this was while I was still a noob…
I learnt all the basics from James… TLs, FIBs, Divergences, Stochs, S&R, some patterns. Glance was a help to get the hang of how to draw TLs the proper way and so on… he really helped me to get started… it took lots of time, because it was hard to get answers to individual questions, but surely the basic and some more information was provided.
…but then, once I got better, around the early summer of 2008 maybe, the quality of his calls was getting worse. He wasn’t calling trades, he was just in xx pips ago. The direction picking wasn’t working properly anymore and so on. Having in mind that he was an experienced trader at a bank,… lead into false thoughts and conclusions. And thats a bad thing for the learning curve for sure.
At that time it began to become a bigger problem that the analysis was mostly hindsight and rarely direct and just when or shortly before things happened. Glance was a good thing, but again a hindsight analysis.
So looking at the things now: The knowledge was definitely good (but as we read here, only copied word by word ), the explanation + teaching style was not optimal and lead (for me) to a slower learning curve.
I still like the system and wouldn’t say that james is the reason if someone loses with the system in general (if someone followed the calls live, he lost of course, while thinking “even the experienced bank trader loses”). We all need to learn and master our method and have to find OUR path. But surely it’s not ok to pretend and lie…
Cheers,
Chris