Hi Babypips community
I asked the Gemini 2.0 Flash the following question related to the thread topic
Hi can you write a summary comparing either the trader or the strategy/indicators that are important in trading providing different terminologies used by TA, PA, or ICT/SMC traders in a table format
For Example
A formula race driver using racing cars can not only drive high-speed vehicles but can also use normal cars effectively and much better than an average driver. Whereas, the normal driver can not drive a vehicle used in Formula race better than the Formula Race driver
I append below the Gemini’s reply for your review:
Okay, let’s break down the trader vs. strategy/indicators debate and then organize the terminology.
Summary: Trader Skill vs. Strategy/Indicators
The core question is: What matters more in trading success – the trader’s skill or the strategy/indicators they use? It’s not an either/or situation, but a blend, with the trader’s skill often being the dominant factor.
-
Strategy/Indicators (The Tools): Strategies and indicators are like the blueprints and tools of a trade. They provide structure, rules, and signals for potential entries and exits. They can be based on price action, technical analysis, or more complex mathematical models. However, they are not foolproof. They are often static and don’t adapt to changing market dynamics.
-
Trader Skill (The Craftsman): The trader’s skill encompasses a wide range of abilities: understanding market context, interpreting price action, managing risk, having emotional discipline, adapting to changing conditions, and knowing when to trust or not trust a strategy/indicator signal. A skilled trader can succeed even with a simpler strategy because they understand why it works and when to apply it. A less skilled trader might struggle even with a sophisticated strategy, misinterpreting signals or failing to manage risk.
The Racing Analogy:
As you mentioned, a skilled F1 driver can easily drive a regular car better than a normal driver. They have the fundamental skills (timing, control, reading the road) that translate across cars. However, an average driver can not just enter an F1 car and drive effectively. A good driver can adapt to any car, but a good car can not adapt to any driver. Similarly, a great trader can adapt and trade profitably under different strategies, whereas a great strategy may not guarantee profits if a trader can not execute it correctly.
Therefore: While having a sound strategy and a useful indicator is necessary, it’s the trader’s ability to execute that strategy consistently, manage risk, adapt, and understand the underlying market dynamics that ultimately determines success.
Terminology Table:
Here’s a table comparing terms used by different types of traders, focusing on how they approach the idea of trading tools versus trader skill:
Term | Technical Analysis (TA) | Price Action ¶ | ICT/Smart Money Concepts (SMC) | Emphasis |
---|---|---|---|---|
Core Belief | Patterns and indicators repeat and predict future price movement. | Price is the ultimate indicator; analyze based on its flow. | Institutional order flow drives market movement, not random patterns. | Trader skill, emotional control, and Risk management are the prime factors. |
Key Tools | Chart patterns, support/resistance, Moving averages, RSI, MACD, Fibonacci, etc. | Candlestick analysis, supply and demand zones, trendlines, price structures. | Order blocks, liquidity pools, fair value gaps, Breaker block, mitigation. | Trader’s understanding of context and application of concepts is emphasized. |
Entry Signals | Indicator crossovers, pattern breakouts. | Pin bars, engulfing patterns, rejections from zones. | Taps into order blocks, liquidity sweeps, refined price action within the areas of interest. | Skill in identifying high-probability setups and execute in a disciplined manner. |
Strategy | Follow the rules of your defined indicator strategy (eg. MA cross-over) | Discretionary based on PA analysis in particular areas. | Combine SMC to define areas of interest, then use PA-based execution. | Strategy is a guideline; it’s the trader’s application that matters. |
Stop Loss | Often based on % of account balance or certain pip value. | Placed beyond identified structural points or below/above supply/demand zones. | Placed just outside the defined range or order block. | Trader’s control over risk management is key. |
Take Profit | Fixed ratio targets or previous swing highs/lows. | Based on previous high/lows or target zones. | Based on liquidity pools or previous swing highs/lows. | Trader’s awareness of key market structures to set targets. |
Market Context | Look for confluence in indicators to validate the price movement. | Understand the underlying trend and where the market might be going. | Identify and trade within range of where the big market movers want to move. | Trader’s understanding of overall market flow is essential. |
Trader’s Role | Rules-based trading, use indicators to minimize subjectivity. | Discretionary trading where your interpretation of PA leads to decisions. | Be adaptable, patient, and disciplined. Execute trades according to defined areas of interest, using PA as confirmation. | Trader as a skilled interpreter and executor, not just a system follower. |
Key Takeaways from the Table:
-
TA: Tends to be more rules-based, emphasizing the predictive nature of patterns and indicators. Trader skill is in finding effective indicator combos.
-
PA: Is more discretionary and focused on direct price observation. Trader skill is in reading the market’s story.
-
ICT/SMC: Focuses on understanding institutional order flow and structures. Trader skill is in identifying these zones and executing trades.
Conclusion
No single trading tool guarantees success, but traders who are skilled at analysis, risk management, and emotional control have the flexibility to use any method effectively. So instead of obsessing with the tool, focus on your skills and your ability to adapt.
I have also attached a screenshot of the EURUSD 15M TF chart depicting the various terminologies used by TA, PA, or ICT/SMC traders. From the chart, you can observe though the concepts are the same, the terminologies are differently used by them.
What is your opinion on the above response of Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Update:
I request the forum members to focus on the thread’s content with the topic’s heading.