Why 100% accuracy means your about to lose big: If you can't take a small loss, you won't take a big loss and you will end up being forced to take a massive loss!

Beginner Questions
7

I do it 2 ways. I’m old so I get to use short cuts:roll_eyes: Anyway, First I go to the daily time frame. Using the previous 20 from the current 7pm EST opening I would draw a line on the highest high and the same for lowest low. Then divide by 2 draw a linr to see where price is in relation to that line.

I also use a free MT4 indicator t_s_r_mtf_range_calculator to compare to my manual analysis. I’m prejudiced, I do not trust my trading to anybody else’s indicators, scripts or advisors. Like I said I’m old.

doc1
doc11596×752 27.5 KB

2 Likes
8

Great share!

9

Hi @Trendswithbenefits,

Unfortunately, it seems your bias against brokers is clouding your judgement. Actually, our best clients are the ones who trade with us for many years, but it is unlikely a new trader will ever reach that level of consistency, if they lose most of their account on a few big trades due to poor risk management.

Studies show the majority of individual trades placed by retail traders are actually profitable, and yet only about 30% of retail traders are profitable overall (based on client profitability stats reported by the CFTC for US brokers). That is because many retail traders are using poor risk management by losing much more money on their losing trades than they make on their winning trades.

The solution is to keep the amount of money lost on losing trades smaller than the amount made on winning trades. A stop loss order is a way to enforce good money management practices by removing emotion from the decision making process when the time comes to close a losing trade, cut losses and move on rather than lose more money.

Stop losses can help enforce a good reward to risk ratio, where you seek at least as much in reward (money made on a winning trade) as you are willing to risk (money lost on a losing trade). The study linked above “shows that 53 percent of all accounts which operated on at least a 1:1 Reward to Risk ratio turned a net-profit in our 12-month sample period. Those under 1:1? A mere 17 percent.”

1 Like
10

Hi @FOREX.com, As I have posted over and over and over again… I’m not telling new traders in these forums not to use a stop loss… just look at alternative methods of risk management…

Unfortunately, Influencers like yourself and others in the BP forums are making a concerted effort to keep the newbies on the blinkered trail and to be successful, preach they must trade like the other 70%(??) that fail in Forex… How does that work BTW?.. It doesn’t… It’s a distortion of reality…

Traders who are really on top of what is going on in these markets won’t be posting in here… Price action algorithms designed to take out zones, defeat Indicators, stretch margins, widen spreads, etc. etc. all kinds of malevolent behaviour is what is taking money from newbies.

Most in the forums take the published success/failure rates by brokerages as gospel, but until I see verified reports by PWC, Andersons, Deloitte or any key auditors, I won’t be drinking the Kool Aid…

Biased definitely… Clouded, no chance, I think for myself and consistent results as posted over the last 5 weeks on my 25% in a month (BTW, That’s the thread to be avoided by Influencers at all cost!!) and my core FX trading accounts would not be achievable if a stop loss was applied for each and every position…

At the end of the day… I don’t give an airborne fornication…I am losing patience in trying to promote fresh, open, creative thinking for new traders in the BP forums, I have been accused of trying to sell product, get traders to do exactly as I do, sock puppeting…oh… and Clouded Judgement… all sorts of absolute crap…

Yet I am one of the very few to post results… solid results, consistent results, transparent results more than once in these forums… so everything I’m doing wrong according to a select few here… is far more profitable than what Industry Standard Forex Education will ever deliver new traders…

8 Likes
11

Okay my friend, I think I understand what you’re trying to illustrate [ in your own weird way :grin:] You’re saying rather than protect your current trade with an order that takes you out of the trade, instead open a trade that counter balances your original trade then it doesn’t matter if word war 3 happens, you can only lose the spread between your original buy trade and your 2nd sell trade, do I have that right?

If that is the case, Do you have rules as to when you will open this counter trade and how much are you risking of your account on the orginal trade and the counter trade? And do you do all this before you enter your orginal trade?

12

This method is applied only when you realise that 1. Price is going to move against you on the longer TF’s ie: 1 Hour, 4 Hour… 2. You are very confident that price will move back to a similar level.

You don’t enter a trade in expectation of applying a hedge… It’s like a SL… You don’t enter into a trade expecting to use your stop… it happens when the market changes direction… Normal trade entry and exit signals are applied… Conditions have been explained in my original post.

@gp00053, This is just one risk management strategy that experienced traders should…

  1. Be aware of

  2. Be all over…

Full description and method was discussed by me and others here over 10 months ago.

4 Likes
13

That’s the part I’m having trouble with. (You know me, just slow :drooling_face: ) You should be entering a trade protecting your bankroll. Your first priority (in my opinion) is to protect your trading account. Without it, you can’t trade.

I think I know it’s for me anyway, that’s what other traders are telling newer traders, that don’t have the experience or emotional control to make decisions. I will say that in my opinion, no matter how much experience you have or emotional control you have, you still need to protect your trading account.

The way again in my opinion the best way for a new trader to do that, is to predetermine your entry risk, and potential profit. From their you review your trades and see what you did right and what you did wrong. As you gain experience, emotional control, patience and understanding, your win loss should improve over the long run.

Now back to your illustration. Can you explain the difference to me from entering your trade, and when market goes against you, you open your hedge and go the opposite way and you say the only loss is the spread in between. But the only way you only lose the spread is by closing both trades? So I don’t understand the difference if I place a stop at the same place you entered your hedge. The only thing I’ve lost is the spread or am I missing something.

In your example before you entered the trade you’re assuming the market is going to go your way, well everyone does that not matter the strategy. When it goes your way, you take your profit. If it doesn’t you get out of the trade. What this is all about is whether you believe you should protect your trading account against the unexpected whatever that can affect the market before you enter a trade. And I think most traders whether they post on BP or not would agree, take steps to protect your trading account before you enter the trade.
As always in my opinion
Gp

14

Thank you for sharing. I have not blown an account so far but I have come close. I identify with your sentiments and will gladly accept your advice. Blessings!:v:

15

Trading is a numbers game and you need to count the pips!

16

Yes I am! And I always set my SL, TP according to the pips calculation.

17

this was the first broker I ever had 20+ years ago, “the more things change the more they stay the same”.

as to your 100% accuracy fallacy, I know I am not there yet, that 99% keeps eluding me though. I dont need to be 100% 99% will be just fine. RT’s stop losses are my bread and butter too @Trendswithbenefits :slight_smile: Stephen System by rrram2 | Myfxbook

18

actually informed traders count the percentage gains, per : day,week,month,year.

pips are meaningless except for huckters trying to sell you some shiznat
complete contest demonstration of pip counting : Contest - rrram2 System by rrram2 | Myfxbook

1 Like
19

unfortunately for @FOREX.com, they seem stirred up by the truth Trendswithbenefits shares :slight_smile:
@Trendswithbenefits post was excellent, and insightful, and its amazing no one really bothered to really read what was written and take it to heart, the post was bulletproof, and quite perfect.

and the main reason RT’s lose money is because their broker failed to educate them on these very things you are claiming as their shortcomings. I bet you folks @FOREX.com just love the kind folks at ESMA. https://www.esma.europa.eu/

How is the ESMA treating you @FOREX.com? I know its bad for brokers to be forced to be transparent. Due to ESMA, brokers are going to have to change, or go out of biz, its real simple.

20

Another lovely, eloquent post!, bulletproof! We aren’t trying to concinve anyone of anything except to stop giving your money away in forex based on lies and misinformation. the herd goes off the cliff, you go with the herd, you too go off the cliff. way too many tales are taught and told about forex. Forget all the BS, and prove it everyday with your live equity curves. I dont need to even check your equity curves I can just listen to the lies you spew and see your equity curves. if you talk about trading and dont do it LOLZ!~
I too can show all the results but it will just make you ill when compared to your own.

1 Like
21

yes it has been a very sticky path for me. I am three trades off that 100%! proof positive that you cant stay 100% forever without misclicking @Trendswithbenefits :smiley:

2 Likes
22

spolier, I am not about to lose big :stuck_out_tongue: change your thinking and you can actually change your trading. Be careful what you believe to be true about trading, if you believe lies, it will be like shooting yourself in the foot and trying to walk. I am very sorry that the truth about trading upsets so many people.

1 Like
23

Thanks for the link to the explanation from last year.

However, if you respond to a loss from failed long by opening a short that’s twice the size, don’t you also need to be ready to open a long that’s now 4 times the size in case of a second reversal, then a short that’s 8 times the size if that reversal reverses?

Alright, I exaggerate, but that’s the logical extension, please show me I’m wrong.

24

I missed this mention. I’ll be reviewing that this week. Thanks for sharing, Trends!

1 Like
25

Why people go for a big loss at once? when they try to get all money in one trade they are actually high risk they do not know market can act both sides either in favor or against. Must trained yourself for challenges with small risks. You will know how market treats a trader and where he is going wrong. Never anyone can make 100% accuracy in analysis or getting targets.

26

really never?!? thats 947 winners out of 950 trades, be assured the account was 100% for quite sometime before a loss was incurred. and frankly there isnt much difference between 99.68% and 100% just 3 trades on 950, nine hundred and fifty, not 9.5