Take a look at the last two bull candles in this 4-hour chart of U/J. With the information you have here, what’s more probable, price getting to the first blue line before reaching the red line? Or, is it more probable you will get stopped out?
What did you base your decision on?
The problem is, beginners fixate solely on risk and reward. But I have a secret to share with you that may change the way you trade. The secret that no one ever talks about is this:
There is more to trading than risk and reward. The most imoprtant variable is left out in almost all trading discussions. And that is probability.
To illustrate, I’ll give an example. Going back to the chart above, using the information given, you have at least a 60% chance of hitting the first profit target (first blue line). That’s easy, because it’s a scalp.
But what about the second blue line? That’s a swing profit, and with swing profits you only have about a 40% chance. So what’s my point?
You cannot have a perfect trade where you have low risk, high reward, and high probability. That would be a perfect trade, and they do not exist.
Here are some easy formulas to follow:
Low risk + High reward = Low probability
High risk + Low reward = High probability
A high probability trade would be to enter long on the above chart right at this minute, taking profit at the first blue line.
Most traders would not do that, since the risk is great and the profit is low. But the probability is very high that you will at least make some money. While I’m not advocating for scalping, I am advocating for probability.
Try this on your next trend trade. Let’s say you want to enter a strong bullish trend. Enter on a weak looking bear candle, then put your stop twice as far as you think it should go (you will have to adjust your position size). Your stop should always be at the prior swing level. Take profit at the next major resistance level, even if you get less than 1:2 RR.
The more you focus your attention on high probability trades and less on what you might lose, you will lose less. Strange paradox, huh?