Fixing My Bad Behaviors – A Journal Experiment

Why this trade journal?

I’m new here, and this journal is an experiment for me. I usually keep my trading journey private, but this time, I feel that sharing in a public forum might be therapeutic and help me overcome my biggest struggle—sticking to my trade plan.

I have an edge, but I struggle to execute it consistently because I can’t handle drawdowns. I hesitate before placing my trades, even though I know it’s a numbers game. If I have 2 or 3 losing trades in a row, I go on tilt and blow up my prop firm account. I’ve done it a million times. I know I’m close to succeeding. I know what it takes. I know what I need to change. If only I could stop blowing prop firm accounts. If only I had the discipline to execute my setup every day and do nothing else—I would be a much better trader.

I want to use this journal to document my journey in overcoming my mental roadblocks. Hopefully, this will be the solution that helps me develop the discipline I absolutely need.

What’s my objective with this Journal Experiment?

My goal is to journal for at least 100 trading days. On average, I take 1–4 trades per day—sometimes more, but there are also days when I don’t trade at all. This should give me a solid sample size of around 250 trades.

If I can maintain strong trading discipline for 100 days, I’ll have achieved something that feels like a dream today. Hopefully, by then, I will have built good habits.

What will I write in this journal?

I’ll try to post after my trading session, but I know I might skip a day here and there—life gets busy.

  • I’ll post my 2-minute NAS100 chart highlighting my trade executions with notes. (I only trade NAS100 from the 2-minute chart. I also analyze the daily, 240-minute, and 30-minute charts, but I won’t post screenshots of these higher timeframes.)
  • After each session, I’ll evaluate my execution and discipline.
  • For this experiment, I’m starting with a brand-new $25K prop firm account. I’ll post my daily P&L. This is a 1-step challenge, where I need to reach a 10% profit target.

My goal is to prove discipline and strong trade execution over at least 100 trades. If I succeed, I’ll likely scale up to a larger account.

How to read my charts?

I put most of my trading notes on my charts, alongside my drawings, which help me read price action (I draw on my charts quite a bit). I should probably explain the color codes I use or provide some kind of legend.

My CCCEM Setup in a Nutshell!

Since my goal with this journal is to push myself toward better discipline and execution, I won’t use it as a platform to test or promote my setup publicly. I’ve backtested my strategy on over 1,000 trades and I know it works.

As for my entry and stop-loss placement, I’m confident I can identify the correct location around 95%+ of the time when my setup presents itself. However, I’m still working on finding my optimal trade exit location. After the fact, it’s always easier—and kind of obvious—but in the heat of the moment with live price action, I still need to improve my decision-making process regarding where to place my take-profit.

I also experience a lot of hesitation before placing a trade because I’m afraid of losing money. This second-guessing—“Should I trade this setup or not?”—often runs through my head.

I’ve always traded supply and demand because it resonated with me the most, but I felt something was missing. I wanted a more mechanical strategy/setup, so I developed my own version of supply and demand, which I call CCCEM. It stands for “Controlling Candle that Created the Explosive Move.”

I’ve backtested my setup across various markets—indexes, oil, gold, BTC, FX—and on several timeframes. I found the best results with NAS100 on the 2-minute chart. What I’m looking for is essentially the strong move away that created the explosive breakout leg and left behind a Fair Value Gap (FVG). I also keep in mind where price is located and where it’s headed on the higher timeframes.

Regarding my risk management, I have a different approach than most traders. I used to risk 1-2% per trade, but whenever I had 2 or 3 losses in a row, I’d revenge trade, go on tilt, and end up blowing the account. I’ve lost so many prop firm accounts because I couldn’t mentally handle drawdowns, so I had to make a change.

Because of this, I recently decided to implement a dynamic risk management system and reduce my risk to 0.2% - 0.5% per trade. If my balance falls below the initial account balance or if I’m in a losing streak, I lower my risk. Conversely, if my balance is well above the initial account balance, I increase my risk.

For this journal experiment and the new $25K account I opened, I’ve set my dynamic risk parameter to a 40-trade buffer. This is very conservative, but that’s okay because I want to focus on the process with this experiment. The max drawdown for this $25K account is 8%. Below is how I risk per trade.

Initial account balance = $25,000

Max account drawdown = $2,000 (8%)

My trade #1 risk = $50 ($2,000 ÷ 40 trade buffer)

Say my balance is at $24,000, my risk would be $25 ($1,000 ÷ 40 trade buffer)

Say my balance is at $26,500, my risk would be $87.50 ($3,500 ÷ 40 trade buffer)

In conclusion, this is a new experience for me, and I’m sure I’ll learn a lot about how to make better use of this forum over the next few months. However, I’d rather jump in quickly and learn along the way than wait any longer. After all, these trading struggles I have need to be fixed ASAP!
I officially started my first trading day for this experiment on Friday, March 7, 2025. I’ll post my first daily journal shortly, and more updates will come later in the week.

3 Likes

This is a picture perfect setup for me:

Friday March 7, 2025

Results = 3.9R (1 winner)
Daily P&L = $175.47

Execution = My T1 was executed as planned. I choose to not trade a B+ setup at mid-day which was a mistake. I hesitated and found a reason why not to take the setup. NAS100 offered me 4 lower quality C-setup during my session from which I was not going to trade them, which was ok.

2 Likes

An edge? (Autocorrect?).

Interesting. Please don’t take this the wrong way, but might the reverse be more true: that if you were a much better trader then you’d have the discipline to execute your setup every day and do nothing else?

I hope you don’t mind the question! I ask it because I know (as a psychologist, myself) that people sometimes express the causation with things like this the other way round, and it does actually colour their thinking and interpretation.

Wishing you good luck with both your trades and your journal!

4 Likes

Maybe you’re right. If I was a good trader my execution would be excellent.
But also, I want to think I can still improve and become a better trader. Maybe if I try to improve my execution and my discipline, I will become a better trader.

Thanks a lot for your input and autocorrect :wink:

3 Likes

Isn’t it the same thing? I would argue you don’t have an edge if you can’t stay disciplined and keep blowing accounts.

4 Likes

Interesting thread and issues that I know first hand.

I’d recommend watching Tom Hougaard trade, it’s a very similar style to what you’re doing, and the thing that gives him the edge is his risk management. The series he’s done this year is truly inspiring and proof you can consistently make big profits week on week. https://www.youtube.com/@TraderTom/streams

5 Likes

In strict outcome terms, maybe. But from a psychologist’s perspective, not in motivational or intentional terms, and those affect outcome-probabilities. In simple English, you’re more likely to achieve it if you say it one way round than the other (it’s my story and I’m sticking to it!). :laughing:

2 Likes

I agree displaying it all for the world to see helps with discipline through accountability. I’m currently doing the same thing with an 8-week experiment. While the journal is for me, I enjoy the fact that other people can comment and see what’s going on.

I wish you ALL the luck.

3 Likes

Monday, March 10: NO TRADE – I wasn’t available to trade.
Tuesday, March 11: NO TRADE – I wasn’t available to trade.

Wednesday, March 12:

Results: +2.5R (2 winners, 1 loser)
Daily P&L: $123.64

Execution
• I had a sell limit order at 19756 and I was going to take this A+ setup, but about 5 minutes before the 8:30 AM CPI news, I removed my limit order. Since I don’t trade red news and the prop firm has a 3-minute rule on news events, I had to avoid taking the short. It’s a bit frustrating because I would have caught the high of the morning session. But that’s ok—there will be more setups!

• My first trade (T2) was a B+ setup and was executed as planned.

• My second trade (T3) was also a B+ setup, but my execution was bad. I got scared and closed the trade early. My TP was at 2.3R, and if I had left the trade alone, my target would have been hit. I wasn’t seeing any convincing buying pressure and convinced myself to exit for only 0.5R. This is something I do way too often—I need to learn to leave the trade alone.

• My third trade (T4) was another B+ setup. This time, I resisted the temptation to move my SL to BE or close the trade early. The setup provided a 1R bounce before stopping me out for a -1R loss. Despite the loss, my execution and discipline were good.

• NAS100 offered a few C setups (zones I marked in yellow). I normally don’t trade C setups, and I stayed disciplined by avoiding these lower-quality setups.

2 Likes

Thurday, March 13:

Results: -1 R (0 winner, 1 loser)
Daily P&L: -$60.08

Discipline and Execution

• I initially identified my first trade (T5) as a B+ setup, but after taking a loss, I reviewed the trade and realized it was actually a C setup because price reversed at my 30-minute key level. This meant the zone was unlikely to hold for another leg lower. My price action read was wrong, but my execution was good. I didn’t move my stop or panic when price turned against me—I accepted my loss.

• The morning price range was once again larger than the long-term average, but the price action quality was not suitable for my setup. Price is just moving inside a 60 minute broader range. It was an extremely boring morning session—a real game of patience. It’s frustrating to see a 400+ point range with no quality setups to trade. But I need to stay disciplined and only trade when my setup presents itself.

After 3 trading days with this journal experiment, I’ve taken 5 trades (3 winners, 2 losers) for a total cumulative gain of 5.3R. The account is off to a slow start, but I’m happy with my discipline so far. I can already see how this experiment can improve my trading behavior.

Monday and Tuesday, I wasn’t available to trade, and I won’t be trading tomorrow as well. It’s definitely a slower start than I anticipated, but starting next week, I’ll be available full-time to trade. Hopefully, NASDAQ will provide plenty of opportunities.

2 Likes

can i be a psychologicalist too

1 Like

Monday, March 17 – Day #4

Results: +0.5R (1 winner, 1 loser)
Daily P&L: +$24.61

Discipline and Execution

• Slow morning price action. No high-quality setups were offered—once again, a game of patience. In the afternoon session, 2 B-quality setups were offered, and I placed a limit buy order at both, but neither was tested. Days like today really help me work on my patience.

• I had a limit order on my B-quality setup (19680), but I decided to remove it 5 minutes before the 9:30 AM open. I was afraid the New York open volatility would stop me out. This was a BAD execution—I should have left my limit order open. This trade would have resulted in 4R+.

• My execution on my first trade (T6) was good. I got wicked out, and then price moved higher.

• My execution on my second trade (T7) was also good. I waited patiently for price to reject my short setup and took profit at the first opposing pivot, as per my original plan.

Thanks to trading, I improved so much on my anger and risk management.

1 Like

I think you had it right the first time.

Discipline is a trait skill traders need to develop, the same way a quarterback or point guard needs good decision making. Some players never develop it and therefore never reach the pros. Others gain it through practice and experience and go on to be all-time great.

I like your original framing better because it embodies a growth mindset (vs a fixed mindset), prioritizing skill acquisition and character development through daily practice and documentation.

Excited to follow along!

1 Like

What do you mean by EA?

Why not just trust the SL? It’s in your strategy. Maybe you need a couple trades where you follow your analysis to the T and you actually add your stops.

1 Like

Thanks for your input—I really appreciate it! EA stands for ‘Expert Advisor.’ I was testing a new EA tool to calculate my position size.

Indeed, that’s what I need to do. But it’s been a struggle for me to execute flawlessly—mostly, I think, because I find it difficult to mentally handle drawdowns. Going on tilt after a few losses is a problem for me, and I hesitate a lot before placing a trade, even though I know it’s a numbers game. My hesitation is the reason I removed my limit order yesterday morning. I’m 100% confident that I’ll be able to fix my tilt problem with this journal, and hopefully, over time, I will also eradicate my hesitation.

1 Like

Tuesday, March 18 – Day #5

Results: +1.8R (1 winner, 0 loser)
Daily P&L: $94.49

Discipline and Execution

Not much to say about my discipline and execution today. I trade my own version of supply and demand, which requires a break followed by a retest. I only enter with a limit order at my supply or demand area. Today was one of those days where we got a nice break, but it just wasn’t retested. The leg that broke down my 30-minute key levels lasted about 15 minutes, and then price did nothing for the rest of the day. At some point, the price action became so boring that I went outside for a long walk, leaving my limit sell order at 19,559 active. My order got triggered (T8) while I was still out on my walk. Watching the price action on my phone, the lack of selling pressure kinda made me close the trade at 1.8R. Had I left the trade alone, my take profit at 3R would have been hit! I left 1R on the table!