The Disappearance of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370
[B]• Boeing believes the missing plane is on the ground in Pakistan[/B]
— although, now (under pressure?), Boeing is backtracking on that assertion.
• Lignet [B]believes the missing plane is on the ground in Pakistan.[/B]
• Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney [B]believes the missing plane is on the ground in Pakistan.[/B]
Pakistan reportedly has four airfields long enough (7,500 ft. or longer) to land a Boeing 777.
Why is it that we are hearing nothing about satellite imagery, or drone reconnaissance, of those airfields?
Instead, the whole world is being invited to join in a “crowdsourced search” effort to examine vast regions of the Indian Ocean. Why is that?
There is strong circumstantial evidence that —
• someone (possibly the pilot) meticulously planned a hijacking of Flight 370,
• the planned hijacking was carried out with precision, and
• the hijacked plane flew for up to 7 hours, after being hijacked and diverted from its original course.
Given this evidence, does it make sense that —
• the hijacker flew the plane for 7 hours into the most remote region of the Indian Ocean, only to crash it where it likely would never be found,
• neither the hijacker, nor any terrorist organization, has made any claim of responsibility for this hijacking,
• neither the hijacker, nor any terrorist organization, has made any demands of the airline, of Malaysia, or of the world at large,
• neither the hijacker, nor any terrorist organization, has issued any manifesto justifying this hijacking ?
If “crowdsourced searching” has merit, why are people NOT being mobilized to search Pakistani airfields?