Political Opinion

An apology is being made by the cartel to the Americans for misunderstanding

Criminals in Mexico Violated Their Unwritten Rule: Leave Americans Alone

The five men were left prostrate on the sidewalk outside their black pickup truck, their shirts pulled over their heads, bare torsos pressed against the ground, their bound hands spread before them almost in supplication.

The handwritten letter on the truck’s windshield read like a formal, albeit chilling and remarkable apology: the Gulf Cartel Scorpion Group was very sorry that their members accidentally shot and killed two Americans and a Mexican bystander while kidnapping two more U.S. citizens.

The men were being offered up to the authorities, the letter said, to make amends for disturbing the peace. On Friday, Mexican prosecutors charged the five men in connection with the abduction and killings.

While Mexican drug cartels thrive in a vacuum of law and order that persists inside Mexico, there is an unspoken rule that many members of organized criminal groups are careful not to cross: do not touch Americans.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/criminals-mexico-violated-unwritten-rule-151924376.html

This is not looking good, Inflation continues to rise and the Fed is set the go back to 0.5 rate hikes starting later this month. The whole reason to raise interest rates is to slow borrowing and slow the amount of new debt ( money) entering the economy. But what good does it do to kill growth in the private sector if the federal government continues to pump over a trillion dollars of new debt ( money) into the economy each year?

And by the way, those government student loans are variable-rate loans and will increase as the Fed raises rates

image

Get it straight from the horse’s mouth, what is your opinion of Powell’s response or lack of response to government spending

US bank failures, payrolls not being met, people in private sector losing jobs. It is all part of the Fed’s plan, and it is working

You just need to update your article, everything will be fine

Just a little math for tomorrow’s CPI report.
Last February was 0.8%. That’s what’s coming off. “They” are predicting a 0.4% from this Feb, which means the Y/Y will go down from 6.4% to 6.0%. Further, LAST March’s was 1.2%! That comes off next month. That may get us down to the low 5’s%?

1 Like

Just saw this…
“In light of recent stress in the banking system, we no longer expect the Fed to deliver a rate hike at its March 22 meeting,” said Goldman’s chief economist Jan Hatzius.

1 Like

There is a lot of conflicting information out there, I don’t believe any of these CPI reports.

How about just for fun and bragging rights we all give our best guess as to what the Fed does on March 22

Choices are 0.25 or 0.50 or no change

The extreme views seem to be always wrong so my personal guess is 0.25

Would be nice if they can get a relief, But we know who’s blocking it.

Elizabeth Warren criticizes ‘overnight’ bailout of SVB customers while leaving ‘millions of student loan borrowers in limbo’

"On Sunday night, regulators announced they would ensure that all deposits at S.V.B. and Signature would be repaid 100 cents on the dollar. Not just small businesses and nonprofits, but also billion-dollar companies, crypto investors and the very venture capital firms that triggered the bank run on S.V.B. in the first place — all in the name of preventing further contagion," Warren wrote.

“Regulators have said that banks, rather than taxpayers, will bear the cost of the federal backstop required to protect deposits. We’ll see if that’s true,” she continued. “But it’s no wonder the American people are skeptical of a system that holds millions of struggling student loan borrowers in limbo but steps in overnight to ensure that billion-dollar crypto firms won’t lose a dime in deposits.”

Republican lawmakers have blasted student-debt relief as a “bailout,” with some calling for the relief to be blocked in a potential deal to raise the debt ceiling.

It’s unclear whether borrowers will end up getting the “bailout” GOP lawmakers oppose, but for now, Warren wants to ensure big banks won’t be able to escape regulation.

“These bank failures were entirely avoidable if Congress and the Fed had done their jobs and kept strong banking regulations in place since 2018,” Warren wrote. “S.V.B. and Signature are gone, and now Washington must act quickly to prevent the next crisis.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/elizabeth-warren-criticizes-overnight-bailout-143317825.html

Interestingly

Republicans are slamming the bailout of Silicon Valley Bank’s customers, saying it’s a giveaway to the rich

The abrupt closure and bailout of Silicon Valley Bank has one side of the aisle crying of inequity, with the federal government’s actions protecting the rich at the expense of the poor.

Interestingly, that critique is coming from the right. On Sunday night, the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve Board, and Financial Deposit Insurance Corporation announced what amounts to a bailout for customers of the now-shuttered Silicon Valley Bank, saying that depositors will be made whole, including deposits over the traditional FDIC insurance limit of $250,000.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/republicans-are-slamming-the-bailout-of-silicon-valley-banks-customers-saying-its-a-giveaway-to-the-rich/ar-AA18A08I

No one is capable of taking responsibility for his or her own actions anymore

Putting the country in danger while blaming others

Trump, Who Bragged About Gutting Dodd-Frank, Claims ‘Wokeness’ Caused SVB Collapse

WASHINGTON ― Former President Donald Trump on Monday blamed “wokeness” for the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank rather than the law he signed in 2018 that gutted the Dodd-Frank federal regulations on smaller banks.

Trump bragged within days of taking office that he would go after the Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama in 2010 after the 2008 financial crisis and which forced banks to be more conservative in investing their depositors’ money.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-bragged-gutting-dodd-frank-005804658.html

This is what the right does when they are to blame. These people are weirdos and are becoming dangerous

Tucker Carlson Blames Diversity and Obama For SVB Collapse

What caused the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank? You may think the disastrous bank run that led to the implosion of SBV was spurred by the effects of deregulation, rising interest rates, and panic among customers—and actual economists would agree. But over at Fox News the demise of the country’s 16th largest bank was actually the fault of their favorite boogeyman: Diversity.

On Monday night, Fox host Tucker Carlson blamed the death of SVB, a California bank that catered to tech startups, on “diversity, equity, and inclusion standards” imposed on the financial sector by the Obama administration. Carlson alleged that policies aimed at diversifying Wall St. included in the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, were used to “kill American meritocracy” and foment incompetence among financial institutions.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-blames-diversity-obama-020525500.html

It’s clear from court filings in the Dominion Voting Systems $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox news that the network cares only about making money, and knows its money comes from telling viewers exactly what they want to hear.

What did Donald Trump actually do to Dodd Frank regulations…??

President Donald Trump signed the biggest rollback of bank regulations since the global financial crisis into law Thursday.

The measure designed to ease rules on all but the largest banks passed both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support. Backers say the legislation will lift burdens unnecessarily put on small and medium-sized lenders by the Dodd-Frank financial reform act and boost economic growth.

Opponents, however, have argued the changes could open taxpayers to more liability if the financial system collapses or increase the chances of discrimination in mortgage lending.

“Dodd-Frank was something they said could not be touched. And honestly, a lot of great Democrats knew that it had to be done and they joined us in the effort,” Trump said before he signed the bill, surrounded by lawmakers from both major parties. “And there is something so nice about bipartisan, and we’re going to have to try more of it. Let’s do more of it.”

The measure eases restrictions on all but the largest banks. It raises the threshold to $250 billion from $50 billion under which banks are deemed too important to the financial system to fail. Those institutions also would not have to undergo stress tests or submit so-called living wills, both safety valves designed to plan for financial disaster.

It eases mortgage loan data reporting requirements for the overwhelming majority of banks. It would add some safeguards for student loan borrowers and also require credit reporting companies to provide free credit monitoring services.

*OH, so the roll back (not gutting!!) of some of the Dodd Frank provisions was a Bipartisan decision and not just frantic actions of the former President…

@SmallPaul So is this mentioned in your latest TDS offering…*

1 Like

Funny how you come to this defense, in doing so, you agree to this?

As I said

So now when it’s both parties you are in agreement when it favors your augurment

Forget what Carlson and Trump have to say, it’s mere commentary… It’s not that important, neither are involved in Government Policy at any level in the United States…

At some point you have to learn to let go…

I don’t agree or disagree with any thing posted by You or Me… I’m not as opinionated as many in this thread appear to be… Just transparently putting the facts forward…

I do agree that all those with accounts under $USD250k should be guaranteed by the Banks own Insurance which it apparently is…

I don’t agree with the US Government making it up again as it goes along and insuring that all their wealthy colleagues (accounts $USD250k+) are bailed out once again by the US Taxpayer…

If you research ALL of the Dodd Frank act that the Obama Administration signed into law, you will realise that much of the act was advantageous to corporate Financial Services.

If you were seriously concerned about the Banking issue… You’d be reporting what Biden, Yellen and Powell have to say…

1 Like

When you stop believing then I’ll let it go.

What you said is like saying fox didn’t have an effect on people reactions on Jan-6

I already told you about Laws that are pass in the u.s., it the little crumbs that are allowed by the lobbyist that matter the most.

Now this is a telling insight into your rational here… Your saying that FOX, the evil news network has a huge effect on peoples reaction overall…Nooo… Say it ain’t so…

Please don’t tell me your running scared from Tucker’s Jan 6 tapes… It was all CNN and MSNBC running a mystery shrouded narrative…

Until Kevin McCarthy released all 44,000 hours of the largely peaceful protest footage from House security cams… A tantalisingly tasty treat of tour guided goodness through a nearly empty White House…

Transparency, as we noted when the Paul Pelosi incident footage was released must be an absolute b!tch

1 Like

You mean those same tapes use to convict some rioters and the tape tucker edited out the violence.

They are becoming increasingly bizarre. It has the air of a cult.

Explaining the Missing Context of Tucker Carlson’s Jan. 6 Presentation

On Jan. 6, 2021, about 140 police officers were assaulted during the Capitol riot, and 326 participants — more than 100 armed with weapons — have been charged. But Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson has used recently released video from that day to misleadingly minimize the violence at the riot and to distort the actions of the police.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/explaining-the-missing-context-of-tucker-carlsons-jan-6-presentation/

Don’t waste my time… It’s okay for children, but it’s not neutral, so encourage multiple websites.

The facts that support the argument are real, but the presentation of the argument is very creative…

Although this website is proposed as a neutral based fact finding website, it is sponsored by a left-biased organization. One should read about the Annenburg histories to determine how the organizations have played a part in American politics and then determine the level of “neutrality”. The “facts” are definitely not neutral based and this website is not truly representative of a bi-partisan nature.

Very biased. I would take Fact Check dot Org with many grains of salt. If you cannot use salt, just don’t bother!

1 Like

Man told you he lie.

Any way you really think that protest was peaceful, Ok buddy :ok_hand: