Organisations like Goldman Sachs sink hundreds of millions of dollars into developing quant systems. And you want it for free? 
Its really not that complex. Im a Quant trader
What about this?
http://forums.babypips.com/free-forex-trading-systems/49920-easy-use-quant-system.html
Your an annoying Bug!!
Something your not aware of, or might be, because this is like your 5th screen name, but we at Babypips try to steer our new people away from people like you…
You see, when you go somewhere new, its not the chair you look for, its the shady characters like yourself that we point out first and foremost… " see that guy over there with the dark glasses, in the corner, with the note pad? Stay away from him, he’s no good"…
You looking for a Quant system, but yet your a Quant trader, lol, yeah, sureeeeeeeee…
Being here, and telling folks about your site, is 1 thing, but what your doing is starting retarted threads to mislead newbies into your circle of crap…
O, and just so you know, there is only 1 Quant system, but since your a Quant trader, you probably already have that single system mastered… Im mean, of course, why would you call yourself a Quant trader, if you dont trade the Quant system…
Your an idiot. There isn’t one quant system. How can there be? Stop grinding my carrot. I’m not doing any thing wrong and i bet you don’t even have the education to be able to read my simple system.
Ill email it to you and you can then tell me what an uneducated dumb @## you are.
You can contact him and he will send you a nice pdf with the system as I did.
He is very nice and willing to help.
So… please change your response because it’s not fair.
I dont need your system, Im consistant 5% a day, and hit 97% ( per 100 trades) with less then 1% downdraw,
Bro, do your thing, Im about to be off this forum anyways, best of luck to your trading, cause in the end, we are here to make money, bottomline…
I think you should read the forum rules, here’s the link: Announcements - Newbie Island
You have broken at least 10 of the 21 rules on this page.
Post something useful and provide good content for this site and you might have been taken seriously. Instead, you showed up as a marketer and not as a trader and now you are an untrusted entity on this forum.
I really Doubt that! Do you have FXbook or why dont you post your report on the forum and put your money where your mouth is?
Stay on topic pls… lol.
Ok, on a serious note. What do you really want? Just wondering. Seems to me a lot of your posts are kinda of pointless, but you are trying to make/prove a certain point.
So what is it?
Im just talking on the forum, adding value where i can. I dont know why you treat my like a shark just because i have a little blog!
Here we go MoneyNVRSleeps!
Let me know if you can even read this!
For everyone else, i managed to upload it to the forum.
here is the link:
Hey chill, this is only our 1st conversation and you say I treat you like a shark (and if you look carefully, I didn’t).
Relax. Theres no need to be combative with your words. Or have an upfront face 2 face challenge (see your response to MoneyNVRSleeps)
Ok, so you are trying to ‘add value’. Ok, cool. Just saying there are better ways to improve your delivery.
I’ve seen such quant systems before. Frankly, would you like my honest opinion (at least according to my experience, being somewhat a quant myself)?
Ever since i got to this forum everyone has been so mean to me so excuse me if I’m a little defensive. I would much rather be your friend than your enemy.
Only if you can be objective and not biased
Only if you can be objective and not biased
Ok, if you say so:
1-A major ‘problem’ about classical quantitative analysis; majority of the people in this forum are not going to read that pdf, because this majority just don’t have the required math skills to actually understand it. Not saying that its not useful. A simple way to explain it would be that not everyone needs to be an engineer to use a cellphone. One just needs to know how to use it. So a better way to deliver your thread would be ‘how to actually make use of the information in the pdf’. Now, that would be way more helpful and may attract people to actually respond.
2-A good quantitative system should have some kind of visual. If you can post charts or even a video showing how to make use of the information / using the so called system, that would be extremely helpful. Not everyone is verbose by nature; there are also going to be people who understand better via visuals. In fact, visuals do help speed up understanding (especially regarding complicated topics), and hence then can get an actual discussion going.
3-I don’t understand it fully, but I would like to see you fully expound upon the system in your own words. Break it down into pieces for easier understanding for others. What I do understand is that this system is almost no different that most moving average crossover systems, other than a suggested use of a trailing stop, which is determined by average current rolling volatility of the market (via proxy using Sharpe ratio).
4-By actual definition, whats stated in that pdf isn’t quite a quant system. It can be part of a quant system thou, since what it merely does is to (attempt to) improve a certain edge (that may or may not exist;that most moving averages actually suffer, due to it being a lagging indicator).
Just my observations.
Im not going to look into that,
YOU dont know what your talking about… You can link sh*t all day, I dont care… YOU prove it… Your the one with a Hedge fund, no? Is it public?
AND, if you knew anything about me, Im a Quant trader,lol… So dont tell me what it is, and try to make me look like a fool…
AND, let me expand on that, that NOT 1 single method of operation is logical… Alot is intuitional trading at this point…