Now that silly gambling question, posted by someone who …I don’t know why they are on this forum in the first place.
This matter is off topic but I thought I would deal with it anyway, and readers can benefit.
[B][U]The Question[/U][/B] : Is Forex gambling?
[B][U]Answer [/U][/B] NO
[B]I will offer proof below…[/B]
I suggest 3 criteria for gambling (you will be able to think of more)
-
There are no goods or services produced - money changes hands only.
-
One person’s gain is another person’s loss.
-
Every trial or bet is an independent event and cannot be predicted by pasts bets or trials.
[B]Lets look at a few cases…[/B]
[B]OPENING A BUSINESS[/B]
- Goods or services are produced.
- No person looses.
- If the business is sold and has a good history (goodwill), then there is good reason to believe the new owner will prosper - the events are not independent.
Therefore - not gambling.
[B]GOING FROM YOU HOUSE TO YOUR LETTERBOX.[/B]
(This walk could be dangerous - lightning could hit you, a big dog could eat you, you may be attacked, heart attack possibility).
- A service is provided.
- No one looses while you check your letterbox.
- The possibility of these dangerous things happening is so small as to be negligible.
[B]ROULETTE[/B]
- True.
- True.
- True - people are forever trying to develp systems to beat the wheel but it does not require an extensive mathematical background to look at the 37/38 identically sized spaces on a roulette wheel (note the 35-1 payoff on a single number) to conclude that the game is [U]umbeatable[/U].
With a 1/38 chance of winning a single number bet and a 35-1 payoff it is easy to calculate the negative expectancy of -5.26.
However, this does not stop huxters from selling systems to gullable people.
The only method that does win is to use visual ballistics, that is visual tracking.
This involves looking at the wheel when it is spun and predicting the correct number by using a method based on the mathematical formulas of kinematics.
You then bet late into the spin.
It is a secret method and highly successful.
You only have to get one prediction in 35 correct to break even.
I usually get it correct about 1 in 7 or 1 in 15.
Sometimes I have been able to get 2 predictions in a row correct.
This, of course, means that you have a substancial edge over the casino.
If you want to know more, here is a hyperlink…
AdvantagePlayer.com: Roulette - Hosted by Laurence Scott
I have used this method and been very successful with it but not with real money because I believe gambling is sinful.
[B]FOREX[/B]
- A service is produced. Read the following thread…
http://forums.babypips.com/forextown/20778-ethics-question.html
[B]Rhodytrader [/B]says…
You do realize, right, that the forex market is the basis for global trade? When you participate in it you contribute to the liquidity of the market for the exchange of currencies which is fundamental to the flow of goods and services around the world.
[B]Clint [/B]in his very excellent and authoritative post says…
Speculators, for their part, provide a vital service to the commercial interests by providing ample, round-the-clock liquidity to the forex market, and by assuming currency-risk which the commercial interests choose to shed.
-
According to the above, not everyone is losing when someone else gains.
However, traders such as [B]Clint [/B]himself, can correct me on that.
-
The price action is not independent of other price actions.
The price of today is directly dependent on what it was yesterday.
This is true for every timeframe and is rather obvious.
[B]So…according to this
Forex is not gambling!![/B]