Nice clean chart! 
Refreshing to see someone using bar charts and not candles! I also switch quite often between them because the price bars are less overpowering and allow greater emphasis on the chart content overall.
2 Likes
Sorry, I should have mentioned that this is the 1hr chart. For my SL I usually use the 4hr and set it to the most obvious swing high/low. The only time I move it is when I’m ready to secure the trade at BE.
1 Like
I’ve been trading using supply and demand, and I find it easier to pick out my bars/zones using the line chart. I wasn’t sure of them at first, but I’ve grown quite fond of them.
Edit This trade is not S/D, it is based on strong/weak rankings.
3 Likes
GBP/USD on D1 is in the middle of a candle, and on H4 mid swing.
One of my 4 check list items is “early entry.”
In the back of my mind I knew it was not an early entry.
I ended up placing the order, and felt like it was wrong. Wrong because it broke my rules. The TP I set would get me a 1:2 R/R. Sounds great!
But I’ve had a bad habit in the past of jumping into the middle of a move. My goal is to catch it in the beginning or not at all.
Jumping in mid move requires a very wide SL, and anything can happen once a trade has already begun.
By a happy mistake I placed an order instead of opening a market order. So, I just cancelled the order.
A few minutes later, price hit what would have been my TP. I was correct, but it still violated my trading plan.
I put myself in the cold shower for 3 minutes again.
2 Likes
But how many minutes would it have been if you had taken the trade against your plan and it had hit your stop loss?
I don’t think it matters at all if we see possible trades and ignore them because they are not according to the main plan so long as we do take the ones that are correct.
Having said that, I sometimes think we can tie ourselves too rigidly to the rules and extinguish some of the pleasure and flair in our trading. Protecting equity is not only about avoiding certain trades, I think it is more about ensuring the trades that we do take have a sensible exposure risk relative to the potential reward. Avoiding losses is not about suffocating our trading or stifling our style.
For example, if the month is going well then one can allow oneself a bit of play room to try other things like other instruments or ideas from other sources which look good, and so on. But we have to be sure that if they go wrong then the cost is proportionate and within the accepted parameters. Even a small position can bring some satisfaction on these occasions even if the actual gain is rather moderate and less than the morale boost it brings!
1 Like
It was a quite small position. .5% risk.
1 Like
It would have been nice to win. It would have been small money, but 2x what I earn at my job in a day.
But just because I won, it doesn’t justify breaking the rules.
I have to learn to follow my strategy before I can start being flexible about it.
I really gotta get greed and FOMO in check. It’s a big problem for me.
But I understand what you’re saying. It’s ok to take small trades just for fun. Right?
I think I can handle that after learning respect for the rules.
If I risk 50% of my account on one trade, and I win, does that make me a good trader?
I think not. Fortunate? Yes. But you can’t survive like that.
1 Like
GBP/USD D1. Yesterday, I got faked out.
This pair has been forming an upward channel for quite a while. It has bounced an old resistance level. I’ve been waiting for it to break out from the upward channel. My plan was to wait for it to break out, then enter a short trade.
However, I learned from my EUR/USD blunder that it’s possible for a pair to break out of one pattern, and form another. EUR/USD broke out a downward channel and formed a range.
GBP/USD is doing the same thing. I trade the MA, but in a small range, the MA will ruin me with false signals. In a range, the MA is just the first sign. If a candle breaks out of a range, then I have two signs, and it’s safer to enter. Once a candle closes outside of the range, it’s safe to start adding additional positions, then ride the swing.
However, during this thought process, I missed the chance to short the range.
Here’s the range hi-lighted.
So, I have to pay closer attention to that.
Even though I got faked out, it’s not so bad because it was only 2%. I actually was going to double my position, but I told myself to chill and placed my second order on the outside of that range–not just outside of the channel.
FOMO got me, but not so bad this time, which is an improvement. A mistake, but a better mistake.
My problem is that I don’t learn my lesson until I lose or feel some pain. But, I think that’s my nature. Otherwise, my brain keeps thinking “What if?” and I have to live with that.
As long as I learn from my mistakes, and I use good judgement to keep these sacrificial mistakes from being excessive, then it’s all good. It’s all a healthy process.
There is also an entry signal because the price bounced the MA20 resistance, BUT…BUT it’s in an range. So, maybe I should just open a .5% risk and that’s it. I can always add later. I want big money (greed) but I could be wrong, so I must protect my money while taking risk. Once I have more entry signals, I can afford 2% and begin scaling in.
I was watching AUD/USD. And it has the same pattern as GBP/USD. I wanted to go in with a wide SL, but then I was going back and forth about it.
That’s usually when I open a trade that I later regret.
It bounced the MA but still in the middle of a range on D1. Anything can happen within the range. Once price leaves the range, it’s safer to enter. But not before.
I figure it would be good practice to just sit this one out and wait for my entry OUTSIDE the range. Even if price moves in my favor, and I would have won some pips, I can’t keep petting a dog that bites. Gotta wait for the entries according to my plan.
I’m considering taking a page from @chrisfraser05’s journal.
Sometimes, checking on trades several times a day is bad for me. Daily action is an emotional roller coaster.
I should check once a day, and once the candle closes I can get a better understanding of what the chart is trying to tell me.
I have a short-term USD/DKK long trade. It bounced the MA, and was bullish for the day, then took a nose dive suddenly. It hit my SL.
Even if my SL wasn’t hit, I would have been worried. And of course, the next day it starts going back up.
A key lesson I’m learning, which I myself have posted on is: ignore the MA in narrow ranges and channels.
That’s not written in stone, but generally, I’m gonna ignore it. And the BIG rule: only open a trade on the S/R bounce–NEVER mid-channel. Anything can happen after that bounce.
1 Like
This morning, I’m updating my journal template. I need separate journal templates for ranges, channels, breakouts and swings.
The difference in each of these is the checklist. The purpose of the checklist is to keep my emotions in check and let the checklist do the thinking for me.
The trick will be not tricking myself into believing I’m following the checklist, which renders the checklist useless. My ability to be honest about what the chart is telling me will determine how well I fight my greed.
2 Likes
I almost don’t want to say this, but as I modify my journals for different trades, I’m thinking that perhaps trading the MA is what’s partly responsible for confusing me and giving me mixed signals.
I think I’m leaning toward trading naked charts and using trend lines only. Haha, is that considered a naked chart?
I noticed I’m using trend lines A LOT. And I really really like them. The way they connect things, and create borders. They’re not guarantees, but they help me see what the market is trying to tell me.
1 Like
I’m trying something new here. Same pair, but two different trades.
One trade based on trend line crossovers (short-term) and the other is based on MA (longer-term).
For example, I just opened two trades for the EUR/USD. Each one is 1% risk. Honestly, I wanted to do 2% for each trade, totaling 4% risk. But I knew I was lying to myself. It’s not 2% per trade if I have two trades for the same price movement.
So, my first trade is based on drawing trend lines at the start of the swing, and when a candle closes on the other side of the TL, I close. Simple. When I open the next TL trade on EUR/USD, I can compound. That’s the advantage of this TL trade: it allows me to compound along the way. Yet, the disadvantage is that being wrong compromises my recent gains.
The other 1% trade is based on trading the entire channel…or 4/5 the total height. This I expect will last a few weeks.
I’m happy about this trade because I managed to defy my greed and limit my risk to 2% TOTAL, even though I wanted to trade 4% total.
The crazy part is that I’m kind of on unsure about where price could go. I’ve been reading about trader psychology, and the fear can immobilize you and make you miss opportunities. Price could go this way…but what if it goes that way? Then you can’t make a decision, and you miss out altogether.
I can’t just sit here and watch the market move forever. I gotta place my order, and an OCO, and leave it alone. Just let it unfold. It’s only one trade. Fear of losing will cause me to not participate at all.
I had told myself that if my trend line strategy and MA strategy are contradicting each other, I should sit it out…I’m wondering if I should have followed that advice.
This is one reason why, at this stage, it is so important to follow your rules and document the results. Otherwise you can never tell with any assurance whether your rules are providing you with an edge over the long term or not. And then you cannot build confidence in your approach.
But if you do not have confidence in your methods then you cannot be decisive about your trade actions.
Confidence is so important here, and it is only built on historic results and knowledge of the methods that produced those results. Otherwise there is nothing to lean on.
This is probably one reason why people seek trading methods from elsewhere. It psychologically provides an escape from personal responsibility for one’s trade actions. It is easier to blame the third-party system than oneself when things go wrong.
But ultimately, one has to face the fact that whatever approach one takes it is one’s own responsibility, and therefore confidence in the long term, overall, positive expectancy of one’s approach is essential in order to take one’s mind off the risk of just the present trade in question.
4 Likes
I am probably missing something here, but why do you say these trades are contradicting each other if they are in the same direction?
But if they are not in the same direction, then your two trades are effectively zero risk until the short term trade is completed?
Perhaps i have misunderstood here?
1 Like
I meant that if price has bounced a support trend line and looks bullish, but maybe it also bounced the MA as resistance.
Which direction do I trade?
Each pair and each range may be different, but I think that if price is in a channel or range, forget about MA.
I’m sticking to that in this trade.
But, I was feeling flustered and confused at that moment. I told myself to trust my trend line and see how it goes. If price goes down, I have an OCO.
Perhaps I would have felt worse if I didn’t do something. There were
some signs there, and I wanted to make a move based on my strategy. I’m trying to let my strategy do the thinking for me.
1 Like
You’re right. I didn’t think of that.
For now, I want to choose the direction and see how it goes. I’m trying not to check on it frequently throughout the day.
1 Like
You know, this is a funny thing. I have the same problem and I often think to myself why is it that I don’t look at my share investments from one week to another and I only occasionally glance at my various fund investments to see how they are doing, and yet whenever I have a position open in my trading account I am thinking about it all the time and trying to sit on hands to avoid watching it! 
1 Like
Sounds like you have a pretty wide portfolio!
Your shares are buy and hold investments? If those are 10-year investments I can understand checking on them once in a while.
But forex and shares, unless you’re trading the M1 or W1, you find out pretty soon if you’re getting a lump of coal or a Red Ryder BB gun.
1 Like
I’m gonna be a Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde trader.
Draw my trend lines, set my trades; then switch charts and turn off my trend lines, and review my MA and place my trades.
I have to switch minds, look at the different charts, and understand what the market is trying to tell me.
Even if the two trades end up being contradictory. If my MA strategy tells me to go long, and my TL strategy tells me to go short…then so be it. It’s likely that one will be correct.
Hopefully, both strategies will often be in the same direction. But if not, it’s ok.
1 Like
I look back at EUR/USD and I see sooo many opprotunities that I missed. Not random entries, but actual signals from my strategy.
The signs are there, but I wasn’t paying attention.
I would like to get better at that.
This could mean a more “rapid fire” style of trading. I’ll have to think more of what this could mean for me. Pros vs cons…