Carlos - it was a rumour started by a journalist from France24 - he reported that both sides are likely to agree on the parts that they’ve agreed on ( apparently 95%) and leave the rest until the new year.
What that would mean in reality is that they implement the easier stuff like vat/security and so on - an extension to the transition period in all but name.
Might be a difficult sell for both sides - that’s why the market gave up GBP gains so quickly.
all we can do is continue to flag these post, maybe someone at Babypips will eventually take action
I defiantly don’t come to this thread for cheering up, these guys can take the ho ho ho out of Santa Claus
not if it is Soy Milk, in 2020 nothing is guaranteed
Here’s another post flagged minutes before the last one I referenced.
Seems
What one wonders - is the common denominator of these posts ? 
i never flag any post in fact since i been a member
If this is true it narrows the list
Does this also mean that China is running Babypips,
It is like Facebook and Twitter were they ban people without ever telling them why they were banned
more 1984 stuff
Not sure anybody answered, but this was discussed many many months ago as a possible pathwayTrump could take would the election not go his way. Maybe even back 12 months. My understanding is that several states have laws that make this idea impossible, as electors have to select the candidate picked by the majority of voters. It’s not a law in every state, as you’ve already mentioned, and I’m not sure whether the historical swing states have this law or not. But I will say many Dems were discussing this at great length in the months preceding the election. You know it’s a real situation when actual electors are coming out making statements that they will vote as mandated by the people.
Very real, but apparently no longer a member of the Trump legal team. Performance based firing perhaps?
So by your logic if I shop at Walmart and some bad people also shop at Walmart that makes me a supporter of those bad people , that is retarded
Just like retarded hillary clintion
Then there was Hollywood trying to convince the Electoral College to not vote for Trump,
I know precious little about the law but my take is maybe it’s to do with conflicts of interests.
Part of me thinks there will be prosecutions coming for some lawmakers, and it might ruin any case she has if she is part of the Trump team.
Of course that’s when I’m wearing my tin foil hat, when I take it off I think maybe this whole thing is a great big nothing burger and Biden did actually win his election fair and square.
In trading it always pays to have more than one hat.
You openly admit that you flag posts and encourage others to do the same, then turn cry baby when someone does it to you.
A touch of doublethink in play here (thats from 1984, Falstaff)
Aye, that was a bit of a shock - Trump confrimed her part of the team in a tweet on Nov15 - so seems she got the sack in the space of a week.
It’s kinda sad end - history will only mention fleetingly the good things instead all the bad stuff will get detailed.
I have a mantra in life - onwards and upwards - and that’s how not only the USA but also the entire Western Democracies will fare.
The only posts I flag are those from scammers trying to extract money from novices and those which put Babypips at potential risk of legal action.
Pleased to hear that, cant say the same for Dennis and I am now wondering who he means by ‘we’, if not yourself.
Its not the first time he’s suggesting flagging others so he’s in no position to complain if he gets flagged back. Same with the name-calling, every so often he asks others to stop doing this but shows no sign of stopping it himself. What does he expect to happen?
WHatever criteria others use, I think we now know who is responsible for those two I mentioned.
Our Nigel has a few words to say !
.
