Political Opinion

How do you know that ? When nobody is allowed to hear What he says ?

1 Like

Antifa proven to be useful idiots

2 Likes

President Trump’s Approval Rating increases to 49% :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

MAGA

Perhaps it would be appropriate to post this on Quadpip’s thread ‘what we are NOT being told about covid’ - as Quadpip has had his account closed due to censorship by Babypips

3 Likes

Who’s smiling now?

They better be prosecuted. Like all the other ones in Minnesota, Portland, etc.!

1 Like

Mmmm that is bad. I wonder what he said. It appears censorship is a growing and very worrying concern as the very essence of a democratic society is the ability to engage in free speech.

Cheers

Blackduck.

3 Likes

I cannot believe how those that hate Trump, and are currently going bat excrement crazy over Trump supporters storming the capital, refuse to acknowledge the riots by Antifa in Portland and may other cities.

Clowns like @SmallPaul @Markaria @peterma none of these people have even tried to offer any justification for those riots in Portland by antfa or the riots by BLM in many other cities. They just ignore these events and act like they never happened.

Cheers

Blackduck

2 Likes

Bad Antifa

Looks like Parlers days may be numbered if they can’t find another host quickly

In your learned opinion is that a good thing or a bad thing??

Blackduck

As a member, I enjoyed my time there so will miss it.
I’m sure something else will fill the void.

I am a member as well. But the point I make is if Parler get booted how is that not censorship and if something else fills the void what’s to say that what ever fills the viod won’t be then censored.

Cheers

Blackduck

1 Like

In the US, a private company denying access to its services is totally legal and acceptable.

I realise this guy is masked, but I sincerely hope he is identified and arrested.

And you regard that as a positive do you ?

In the US or even in our own UK - would it be legal & acceptable for someone to be denied a platform by the concerted and united action of All the major platform providers - acting in unison - as though they were a single monopolly provider ?

ie - In the famous “baker and the Gay Wedding case” - would it have been ok for the Baker - not only to refuse to bake the cake - but also to ring up all the other Bakers and conspire with them to prevent the cake being baked at all ? :innocent:

In fact this case is even more egregious than that.

Consider a comunity with only two bakers.
Baker a) refuses to bake the "Gay Wedding Cake"

SO the Gay couple go to Baker b) - who accepts the commission willingly.

Then Baker a) Rings his Sister in LAw who happens to be teh Landlord of Baker b) and gets Baker b) thrown out of his shop - for the simple crime of agreeing to do something perfectly Legal and acceptable. To wit - Baking the cake !

I wonder how the high court would have seen that set of circumstances ?

In Fact - You tell us @Markaria - Is one or both of the scenarios I outline, acceptable or not ? - If not why not ? and if so why so ?

3 Likes

I’m guessing it depends on WHO’S free speech it is. They’d never go after the other side…

2 Likes

It certainly does my friend. I kind of hope that the left suceed in silencing every and any type of conservative media to the point all you hear from the media is left wing socialist propaganda.

The left are so stupid they do not realise that once they created a vacuum of not having an enemy to pursue the only thing left will be to turn on each other.

Won’t that be fun to see??

Cheers

Blackduck

1 Like