Political Opinion

Good or Bad Idea?

Montana says 1st-in-the-nation TikTok ban protects people. TikTok says it violates company’s right

HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Montana became the first state in the U.S. to enact a complete ban on TikTok on Wednesday when Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte signed a measure that’s more sweeping than any other state’s attempts to curtail the social media app, which is owned by a Chinese tech company.

The measure, scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, 2024, is expected to be challenged legally and will serve as a testing ground for the TikTok-free America that many national lawmakers have envisioned. Cybersecurity experts say it could be difficult to enforce the ban.

“Today, Montana takes the most decisive action of any state to protect Montanans’ private data and sensitive personal information from being harvested by the Chinese Communist Party,” Gianforte said in a statement.

,Montana says 1st-in-the-nation TikTok ban protects people. TikTok says it violates company's right

How does a state ban an app, that anyone can download from the Apple App store?

image

How would that work? I don’t know, maybe they have a app blocker and a phone tracker that knows what state you are in

A lot of these “Online Stores” have location geometrics built in, they can detect the IP of the device and it’s registered address…

Anyone that watched the Super Pumped miniseries, (worth watching) about the origins of Uber will have seen how Uber tried to get around the Apple Stores terms and conditions by using a geo-fence so Apple would be unaware that they were collecting data on everyone using the Uber App…

Australia’s Federal Government has banned TikTok on any Government communication devices…

Unsurprisingly, those state Governments (Victoria) that have a soft spot for the CCP via China’s Belt and Road initiative are choosing to ignore the directive deeming it racist!!

2 Likes

We have the Durham report out that says there was no Trump-Russia collusion and the report goes on to criticize the FBI’s handling of the case. A few left-leaning news outlets including USA Today have called Russiagate a complete hoax, but the NY Times and Rachel Madcow who for three 3 years pushed the now defunct conspiracy theory, refuse to admit they were wrong and have publicly denounced the Durham report.

image

Jimmy Dore, again doing the job most media refuses to do, discusses the report with award-winning journalist Aaron Mate

Thank God it is Friday

1 Like

image

1 Like

And, wait for it, there were FBI plants in the Jan 6, uh, event!

2 Likes

It makes sense that the missing informant was a lie from the beginning.

‘You Don’t Actually Have Any Facts’: Even Fox Isn’t Buying GOP’s Claims About Biden’s Foreign Business Dealings

House Republicans have been promising to expose President Joe Biden’s supposedly criminal business dealings with foreign entities for months. But the biggest takeaway from Oversight Committee Chair James Comer’s (R-Ky.) much-hyped press conference on Wednesday revealing the GOP’s “findings” was just the opposite — they don’t have the goods.

What Republicans presented on “judgment day” was a memo outlining more than $10 million in payments received by members of the Biden family from foreign businesses between 2015-2017. But the findings lacked a crucial detail — concrete evidence linking Biden to the dealings of his family members. The omission was so stark that even the president’s most fervent critics at Fox felt the need to confront Comer on the nothingness of the burger.

“Your party, the Republican investigators, say that that’s proof of influence peddling by Hunter and James [Biden], but that’s just your suggestion. You don’t actually have any facts to that point. You’ve got some circumstantial evidence,” said Fox host Steve Doocey in an interview with Comer on Thursday.

“Of all those names, the one person who didn’t profit — there’s no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegally.”

<‘You Don’t Actually Have Any Facts’: Even Fox Isn’t Buying GOP’s Claims About Biden’s Foreign Business Dealings

Military aid to the Ukraine is a major subject of debt ceiling discussions. Will they continue to support it?

McCarthy shoots down Russian reporter who says he opposes aid to Ukraine

May 01, 2023 05:57 PM

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said he supports aid to Ukraine and will continue to do so in response to a Russian reporter’s question at a news conference on Monday.

“I vote for aid to Ukraine. I support aid to Ukraine,” McCarthy said at a news conference following his speech to the Knesset, Israel’s legislative body. “I do not support what your country has done to Ukraine. I do not support your killing of the children either.”

The reporter, from Russian state-owned media outlet RIA Novosti, started his question by saying he knows McCarthy doesn’t “support the current unlimited and uncontrolled supply of weaponry and aid to Ukraine” and asked the speaker if it is “possible in the near future the U.S. policy regarding sending weaponry to Ukraine will change?”

McCarthy rejected the reporter’s characterization of his stance and said he believes Russia “should pull out” of Ukraine and doesn’t think Russia’s invasion of the country is legitimate.

“We will continue to support because the rest of the world sees it just as it is,” he said."

<McCarthy shoots down Russian reporter who says he opposes aid to Ukraine | Washington Examiner

Calling it as it is.

Bottom line - you either support killing or not - McCarthy is echoing all right thinking ppl.

It’s dead simple - Russia get the hell out of Ukraine - your grievances can be sorted without killing little people.

3 Likes

People would love for the U.S. and the west to stop supplying aid to Ukraine, giving Russia the advantage. As a result, a country is left defenseless against invaders.

And right on que… General Dynamics are suppling F16’s to Ukraine… No Doubt the training, spare parts and maintenance contracts will be worth a fortune…

Wasting my breath discussing anything aeronautical in these threads… The F16 is no match for the Sukhoi Su-54/57 (5th Gen.) the Russians are using…

Strange… When the (MD) Boeing F15 Eagle or the Fairchild Republic A-10 Warthog are much better air to ground platforms for close support and stopping mechanised ground forces…

Maybe their not part of the Pentagon’s preferred supplier program???

1 Like

It is important that you educate the thread

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly called on Washington to provide F16

Zelenskyy knows it’s the only plane that the US will offer as part of it’s handout rental fleet… The F16 is the Toyota Camry of military avionics… Does everything well, but nothing great…

Just like the Camry…

The west wants Ukraine to win this war but has been wary of sending advance weapons to Ukraine

Biden says Zelenskyy gave a ‘flat assurance’ that F-16s fighter jets wouldn’t attack Russian territory as drastic policy shift takes shape

President Joe Biden said he received “flat assurance” from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Ukraine would not use F-16 fighter jets to attack Russian territory.

Earlier this week, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced the UK and the Netherlands would build an “international coalition” to help the country procure the fighter jets.

The US president also announced another $375 million in military assistance to Ukraine to help support its long-running and bloody battle with Putin’s regime.

Biden said at a press conference in Hiroshima that “Vladimir Putin will not break our resolve” and reiterated the G7 countries’ “shared and unwavering commitment to stand with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend themselves against Russia’s brutal war of aggression and the war crimes being committed.”

,Biden says Zelenskyy gave a 'flat assurance' that F-16s fighter jets wouldn't attack Russian territory as drastic policy shift takes shape

Ok…This is where anyone with an interest in military matters just doesn’t buy this tale of fantasy… This is more of a propaganda exercise of late than what was a few months ago a war of attrition…

The Russians are no longer using aircraft or helicopters over the Ukraine due to the advanced mobile ground to air equipment supplied to the Ukrainians by the west… Taking out their very expensive and very limited number of modern aircraft…

Hence the missile bombardments of crucial infrastructure and strategic towns… The F16’s only advantage against the Russian aircraft is manoeuvrability in a dogfight…

This said… The US supplied jets will never even get close to the 5th gen Russian fighters before being shot out of the sky…

The F16 is not a Bomber or close support platform for troops on the ground… So what use other than supersonic intrusion into Russian or Crimean airspace are these assets going to be??

1 Like

I don’t see the west supplying Ukraine with super advance weapons at this time, russia is putting a strain on its massive stockpile, the west is waiting and seeing what russia does before sending more advance weapons to Ukraine.

But analysts cautioned that the jets aren’t a cure-all and have vulnerabilities that Moscow would be well aware of and could exploit. In fact, one active duty F-16 pilot told CNN that expectations may be way too high…

“To your question about the F-16 being a difference maker. It’s not, getting the Ukrainian’s F-16s will be a morale boost and add some limited combat capability, that’s all,” the pilot said.

Who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the subject.

Pilot training can go a long way if they get more advanced equipment in the future; there is a bigger plan at work here. as i stated russia is putting a strain on its massive stockpile

Again, Cancel Culture wants to cancel and boycott everything they disagree with, now they are going after Fox News, A private company who was following state laws.

Right-Wingers Furious That Fox News Doesn’t Hate Trans People As Much As They Do

And now, Fox finds itself on the wrong side of a culture war it helped to foment.

Despite broadcasting hundreds of segments attacking trans people, platforming viciously transphobic guests, and relentlessly demonizing trans individuals who then receive harassment and death threats, it seems that Fox News is actually “woke” on matters of gender identity. That’s according to a report from the Daily Signal , a right-wing media outlet owned by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The story is based on the leak of a Fox employee handbook dating from January 2021, which includes policies aimed at affirming staff members’ gender transitions. Employees can dress and use restrooms in accordance with their gender identity and are to be addressed by their preferred pronouns. All of which, for anti-trans hardliners, represents a grotesque betrayal of the brand’s supposed values.

The Daily Signal article notes that none of this is really up to Fox — the handbook policies conform to legal protections enforced by New York (where the company is based) and California (where it maintains a substantial workforce). But the grievance machine cares not for such excuses, and far-right influencers who see no room for compromise in their anti-LGBTQ hate campaign are condemning Fox as a secretly tolerant organization.

<Right-Wingers Furious That Fox News Doesn’t Hate Trans People As Much As They Do

image